BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//128.220.36.25//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.26.9// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-FROM-URL:https://www.clsp.jhu.edu X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/New_York BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20231105T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RDATE:20241103T020000 TZNAME:EST END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20240310T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 RDATE:20250309T020000 TZNAME:EDT END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-21041@www.clsp.jhu.edu DTSTAMP:20240328T124705Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Seminars CONTACT: DESCRIPTION:Abstract\nNarration is a universal human practice that serves a s a key site of education\, collective memory\, fostering social belief sy stems\, and furthering human creativity. Recent studies in economics (Shil ler\, 2020)\, climate science (Bushell et al.\, 2017)\, political polariza tion (Kubin et al.\, 2021)\, and mental health (Adler et al.\, 2016) sugge st an emerging interdisciplinary consensus that narrative is a central con cept for understanding human behavior and beliefs. For close to half a cen tury\, the field of narratology has developed a rich set of theoretical fr ameworks for understanding narrative. And yet these theories have largely gone untested on large\, heterogenous collections of texts. Scholars conti nue to generate schemas by extrapolating from small numbers of manually ob served documents. In this talk\, I will discuss how we can use machine lea rning to develop data-driven theories of narration to better understand wh at Labov and Waletzky called “the simplest and most fundamental narrative structures.” How can machine learning help us approach what we might call a minimal theory of narrativity?\nBiography\nAndrew Piper is Professor and William Dawson Scholar in the Department of Languages\, Literatures\, and Cultures at McGill University. He is the director of _.txtlab \n_\,\n a l aboratory for cultural analytics\, and editor of the /Journal of Cultural Analytics/\, an open-access journal dedicated to the computational study o f culture. He is the author of numerous books and articles on the relation ship of technology and reading\, including /Book Was There: Reading in Ele ctronic Times/(Chicago 2012)\, /Enumerations: Data and Literary Study/(Chi cago 2018)\, and most recently\, /Can We Be Wrong? The Problem of Textual Evidence in a Time of Data/(Cambridge 2020). DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20211112T120000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20211112T131500 LOCATION:Hackerman Hall B17 @ 3400 N. Charles Street\, Baltimore\, MD 21218 SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Andrew Piper (McGill University) ” How can we use machine learning to understand narration?” URL:https://www.clsp.jhu.edu/events/andrew-piper-mcgill-university-how-can- we-use-machine-learning-to-understand-narration/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n
\\nAbstr act
\nNarration is a universal human practice that serves a s a key site of education\, collective memory\, fostering social belief sy stems\, and furthering human creativity. Recent studies in economics (Shil ler\, 2020)\, climate science (Bushell et al.\, 2017)\, political polariza tion (Kubin et al.\, 2021)\, and mental health (Adler et al.\, 2016) sugge st an emerging interdisciplinary consensus that narrative is a central con cept for understanding human behavior and beliefs. For close to half a cen tury\, the field of narratology has developed a rich set of theoretical fr ameworks for understanding narrative. And yet these theories have largely gone untested on large\, heterogenous collections of texts. Scholars conti nue to generate schemas by extrapolating from small numbers of manually ob served documents. In this talk\, I will discuss how we can use machine lea rning to develop data-driven theories of narration to better understand wh at Labov and Waletzky called “the simplest and most fundamental narrative structures.” How can machine learning help us approach what we might call a minimal theory of narrativity?
\nBiography
\n< p>Andrew Piper is Professor and William D awson Scholar in the Department of Languages\, Literatures\, and Cultures at McGill University. He is the director of _.txtlab \n\na laboratory for cultural ana lytics\, and editor of the /Journal of Cultural Analytics/\, an open-acces s journal dedicated to the computational study of culture. He is the autho r of numerous books and articles on the relationship of technology and rea ding\, including /Book Was There: Reading in Electronic Times/(Chicago 201 2)\, /Enumerations: Data and Literary Study/(Chicago 2018)\, and most rece ntly\, /Can We Be Wrong? The Problem of Textual Evidence in a Time of Data /(Cambridge 2020).
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:2021\,November\,Piper END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-22394@www.clsp.jhu.edu DTSTAMP:20240328T124705Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Seminars CONTACT: DESCRIPTION:Abstract\n\nModel robustness and spurious correlations have rec eived increasing attention in the NLP community\, both in methods and eval uation. The term “spurious correlation” is overloaded though and can refer to any undesirable shortcuts learned by the model\, as judged by domain e xperts.\n\n\nWhen designing mitigation algorithms\, we often (implicitly) assume that a spurious feature is irrelevant for prediction. However\, man y features in NLP (e.g. word overlap and negation) are not spurious in the sense that the background is spurious for classifying objects in an image . In contrast\, they carry important information that’s needed to make pre dictions by humans. In this talk\, we argue that it is more productive to characterize features in terms of their necessity and sufficiency for pred iction. We then discuss the implications of this categorization in represe ntation\, learning\, and evaluation.\nBiography\nHe He is an Assistant Pro fessor in the Department of Computer Science and the Center for Data Scien ce at New York University. She obtained her PhD in Computer Science at the University of Maryland\, College Park. Before joining NYU\, she spent a y ear at AWS AI and was a post-doc at Stanford University before that. She i s interested in building robust and trustworthy NLP systems in human-cente red settings. Her recent research focus includes robust language understan ding\, collaborative text generation\, and understanding capabilities and issues of large language models. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20221014T120000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20221014T131500 LOCATION:Hackerman Hall B17 @ 3400 N. Charles Street\, Baltimore\, MD 21218 SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:He He (New York University) “What We Talk about When We Talk about Spurious Correlations in NLP” URL:https://www.clsp.jhu.edu/events/he-he-new-york-university/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nAbstr act
\nModel robustness and spuri ous correlations have received increasing attention in the NLP community\, both in methods and evaluation. The term “spurious correlation” is overlo aded though and can refer to any undesirable shortcuts learned by the mode l\, as judged by domain experts.
\nWhen designing mitigation algorithms\, we often (implicitly) assume that a spurious feature is irrelevant for prediction. However\, many features in NLP (e.g. word overlap and negation) are not spurious in the sense that the background is spurious for classifying objects in an image. In contra st\, they carry important information that’s needed to make predictions by humans. In this talk\, we argue that it is more productive to characteriz e features in terms of their necessity and sufficiency for prediction. We then discuss the implications of this categorization in representation\, l earning\, and evaluation.
\nBiography
\nHe He is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science and the C enter for Data Science at New York University. She obtained her PhD in Com puter Science at the University of Maryland\, College Park. Before joining NYU\, she spent a year at AWS AI and was a post-doc at Stanford Universit y before that. She is interested in building robust and trustworthy NLP sy stems in human-centered settings. Her recent research focus includes robus t language understanding\, collaborative text generation\, and understandi ng capabilities and issues of large language models.
\n