BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//128.220.36.25//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.26.9// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-FROM-URL:https://www.clsp.jhu.edu X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/New_York BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20231105T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RDATE:20241103T020000 TZNAME:EST END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20240310T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 RDATE:20250309T020000 TZNAME:EDT END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-20987@www.clsp.jhu.edu DTSTAMP:20240329T160207Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Seminars CONTACT: DESCRIPTION:Abstract\nWhile there is a vast amount of text written about ne arly any topic\, this is often difficult for someone unfamiliar with a spe cific field to understand. Automated text simplification aims to reduce th e complexity of a document\, making it more comprehensible to a broader au dience. Much of the research in this field has traditionally focused on si mplification sub-tasks\, such as lexical\, syntactic\, or sentence-level s implification. However\, current systems struggle to consistently produce high-quality simplifications. Phrase-based models tend to make too many po or transformations\; on the other hand\, recent neural models\, while prod ucing grammatical output\, often do not make all needed changes to the ori ginal text. In this thesis\, I discuss novel approaches for improving lexi cal and sentence-level simplification systems. Regarding sentence simplifi cation models\, after noting that encouraging diversity at inference time leads to significant improvements\, I take a closer look at the idea of di versity and perform an exhaustive comparison of diverse decoding technique s on other generation tasks. I also discuss the limitations in the framing of current simplification tasks\, which prevent these models from yet bei ng practically useful. Thus\, I also propose a retrieval-based reformulati on of the problem. Specifically\, starting with a document\, I identify co ncepts critical to understanding its content\, and then retrieve documents relevant for each concept\, re-ranking them based on the desired complexi ty level.\nBiography\nI’m a research scientist at the HLTCOE at Johns Hopk ins University. My primary research interests are in language generation\, diverse and constrained decoding\, and information retrieval. During my P hD I focused mainly on the task of text simplification\, and now am workin g on formulating structured prediction problems as end-to-end generation t asks. I received my PhD in July 2021 from the University of Pennsylvania w ith Chris Callison-Burch and Marianna Apidianaki. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20211022T120000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20211022T131500 LOCATION:Hackerman Hall B17 @ 3400 N. Charles Street\, Baltimore\, MD 21218 SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Reno Kriz (HLTCOE – JHU) “Towards a Practically Useful Text Simplif ication System” URL:https://www.clsp.jhu.edu/events/reno-kriz-hltcoe-jhu-towards-a-practica lly-useful-text-simplification-system/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n
\\nAbstr act
\nWhile there is a vast amount of text written about ne arly any topic\, this is often difficult for someone unfamiliar with a spe cific field to understand. Automated text simplification aims to reduce th e complexity of a document\, making it more comprehensible to a broader au dience. Much of the research in this field has traditionally focused on si mplification sub-tasks\, such as lexical\, syntactic\, or sentence-level s implification. However\, current systems struggle to consistently produce high-quality simplifications. Phrase-based models tend to make too many po or transformations\; on the other hand\, recent neural models\, while prod ucing grammatical output\, often do not make all needed changes to the ori ginal text. In this thesis\, I discuss novel approaches for improving lexi cal and sentence-level simplification systems. Regarding sentence simplifi cation models\, after noting that encouraging diversity at inference time leads to significant improvements\, I take a closer look at the idea of di versity and perform an exhaustive comparison of diverse decoding technique s on other generation tasks. I also discuss the limitations in the framing of current simplification tasks\, which prevent these models from yet bei ng practically useful. Thus\, I also propose a retrieval-based reformulati on of the problem. Specifically\, starting with a document\, I identify co ncepts critical to understanding its content\, and then retrieve documents relevant for each concept\, re-ranking them based on the desired complexi ty level.
\nBiography
\nI ’m a research scientist at the HLTCOE at Johns Hopkins University. My prim ary research interests are in language generation\, diverse and constraine d decoding\, and information retrieval. During my PhD I focused mainly on the task of text simplification\, and now am working on formulating struct ured prediction problems as end-to-end generation tasks. I received my PhD in July 2021 from the University of Pennsylvania with Chris Callison-Burc h and Marianna Apidianaki.
\n\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:2021\,Kriz\,October END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-21041@www.clsp.jhu.edu DTSTAMP:20240329T160207Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Seminars CONTACT: DESCRIPTION:Abstract\nNarration is a universal human practice that serves a s a key site of education\, collective memory\, fostering social belief sy stems\, and furthering human creativity. Recent studies in economics (Shil ler\, 2020)\, climate science (Bushell et al.\, 2017)\, political polariza tion (Kubin et al.\, 2021)\, and mental health (Adler et al.\, 2016) sugge st an emerging interdisciplinary consensus that narrative is a central con cept for understanding human behavior and beliefs. For close to half a cen tury\, the field of narratology has developed a rich set of theoretical fr ameworks for understanding narrative. And yet these theories have largely gone untested on large\, heterogenous collections of texts. Scholars conti nue to generate schemas by extrapolating from small numbers of manually ob served documents. In this talk\, I will discuss how we can use machine lea rning to develop data-driven theories of narration to better understand wh at Labov and Waletzky called “the simplest and most fundamental narrative structures.” How can machine learning help us approach what we might call a minimal theory of narrativity?\nBiography\nAndrew Piper is Professor and William Dawson Scholar in the Department of Languages\, Literatures\, and Cultures at McGill University. He is the director of _.txtlab \n_\,\n a l aboratory for cultural analytics\, and editor of the /Journal of Cultural Analytics/\, an open-access journal dedicated to the computational study o f culture. He is the author of numerous books and articles on the relation ship of technology and reading\, including /Book Was There: Reading in Ele ctronic Times/(Chicago 2012)\, /Enumerations: Data and Literary Study/(Chi cago 2018)\, and most recently\, /Can We Be Wrong? The Problem of Textual Evidence in a Time of Data/(Cambridge 2020). DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20211112T120000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20211112T131500 LOCATION:Hackerman Hall B17 @ 3400 N. Charles Street\, Baltimore\, MD 21218 SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Andrew Piper (McGill University) ” How can we use machine learning to understand narration?” URL:https://www.clsp.jhu.edu/events/andrew-piper-mcgill-university-how-can- we-use-machine-learning-to-understand-narration/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n
\\nAbstr act
\nNarration is a universal human practice that serves a s a key site of education\, collective memory\, fostering social belief sy stems\, and furthering human creativity. Recent studies in economics (Shil ler\, 2020)\, climate science (Bushell et al.\, 2017)\, political polariza tion (Kubin et al.\, 2021)\, and mental health (Adler et al.\, 2016) sugge st an emerging interdisciplinary consensus that narrative is a central con cept for understanding human behavior and beliefs. For close to half a cen tury\, the field of narratology has developed a rich set of theoretical fr ameworks for understanding narrative. And yet these theories have largely gone untested on large\, heterogenous collections of texts. Scholars conti nue to generate schemas by extrapolating from small numbers of manually ob served documents. In this talk\, I will discuss how we can use machine lea rning to develop data-driven theories of narration to better understand wh at Labov and Waletzky called “the simplest and most fundamental narrative structures.” How can machine learning help us approach what we might call a minimal theory of narrativity?
\nBiography
\n< p>Andrew Piper is Professor and William D awson Scholar in the Department of Languages\, Literatures\, and Cultures at McGill University. He is the director of _.txtlab \n\na laboratory for cultural ana lytics\, and editor of the /Journal of Cultural Analytics/\, an open-acces s journal dedicated to the computational study of culture. He is the autho r of numerous books and articles on the relationship of technology and rea ding\, including /Book Was There: Reading in Electronic Times/(Chicago 201 2)\, /Enumerations: Data and Literary Study/(Chicago 2018)\, and most rece ntly\, /Can We Be Wrong? The Problem of Textual Evidence in a Time of Data /(Cambridge 2020).
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:2021\,November\,Piper END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR